Movies

European Cinema (Lola Rennt)

Cinema of Europe

Explore the very best movies from Western, Southern and Northern Europe, based on a selection of over 9,100 films.

Join us in shifting the world’s focus on American cinema back to the many other equally rich, yet underappreciated film industries around the world. In this article series, we highlight several hidden gems produced within a certain geographical region, one film per country, from the riches of Europe to the remote island nations of Polynesia.

As a bonus, we will make a donation to the welfare of wild cats, and the preservation of their habitats, for every film purchased through this site.

Table of Contents

Pick a Country

BelgiumDenmarkEstoniaFinlandFranceGermanyGreeceIcelandIrelandItalyLithuaniaThe NetherlandsNorwaySpainSwedenSwitzerlandUnited KingdomWest-Germany

The History of European Cinema

Before World War I, Germany, Italy, France, and Britain dominated the worldwide film industry. The destructive nature of both World Wars caused many of Europe’s film industries to falter, as its hosting countries lacked funding for the motion picture industry. Meanwhile, the United States had reached what is now known as “the Golden Age of cinema”. Import embargos prevented American films from reaching Europe during World War II, but once those embargos were lifted, the European markets were flooded with American films that had been produced during the war.

The heavy competition arising from this steady stream of films being imported into Europe meant the final nail in the coffin for many national film industries. It wasn’t until the late 20th century that European cinema found its footing again.

European Cinema (Lola Rennt)
(Credit: Lola Runs / Lola Rennt, Germany)

Today, the modern European film landscape is still dominated by American films. Thanks to decades of growth, North American film studios can now continuously produce big-budget films, easily fending off foreign competition. This has forced European production houses to focus on a cheaper, more cost-effective form of film: art house productions. Europe became known for the production of serious, small scale films, focusing on different aspects of everyday life and the emotional struggles originating from it…

The Best Films from Western Europe

We start off in bustling Western Europe, visiting the national film industries of some of the world’s most prolific non-English cinematic landscapes. Hitting the ground running, we explore the controversial films of the Netherlands, before moving into experimental Germany and looking back at the impressive output of West-Germany. We continue our journey through gentle-natured Belgium, eclectic France, working-class Ireland, and the prolific United Kingdom. Slowly migrating south, we cross mountainous Switzerland to reach the sun covered beaches of Southern Europe.

The Netherlands: Off Track

Directed by: Sander Burger, 2017.

World Cinema 001 - The Netherlands (Off Track)
(Credit: Off Track)

Worldwide, the Netherlands is known for its open-mindedness, famously legalizing soft drugs, prostitution, and euthanasia. Dutch films are similarly known for their blasé handling of taboos. It’s not uncommon for a Dutch movie to depict a sweaty sex scene complete with freely dangling genitals, or to show a character doing his or her business on the toilet. If you haven’t seen at least one pair of bare breasts bouncing around in the latest Dutch movie you watched, you might have mistaken a Flemish film for a Dutch one.

Though the first Dutch film, Disturbed Angler (1896) was a fictional slapstick comedy, the country was renowned for the production of documentary films before fiction films grew in popularity. National cinema didn’t start gaining in popularity until the 1970s. From the 1970s to the 1990s, directors Paul Verhoeven and Dick Maas boosted the national film industry with commercial films such as Turkish Delight (1973) and Flodder (1986) – each having a fairly high breast count – but it wasn’t until the early 2000s that Dutch film really found its footing. Sadly, this was paired with a steady stream of lackluster releases: every year the Dutch film industry churned out a host of silly, star-studded romantic comedies, leaving audiences skeptical at the idea of quality Dutch cinema – as is evident in the low IMDb scores for about every Dutch movie ever made.

Because it was extremely difficult for producers to gain funding for their projects, the public broadcasting foundation Nederlandse Publieke Omroep initiated the Telefilm initiative in 1998; a financial support system aiding the production of six made-for-television films per year. Over 20 years and 100 titles later, the Telefilms are stronger than ever, offering up films that put the country’s cinematic output to shame.

Off Track (2017) is one of those Telefilms. First broadcasted in 2017, the film tells the story of three Dutch men enjoying life on the road in Ecuador. After a nightly adventure at a local club, the backpackers are lured into a shady brothel. There, main character Luuk encounters Soledad, a young prostitute forced to work under dire conditions. Shocked by his encounter with Soledad, Luuk takes the story of meeting a “hooker with a heart of gold” one step further: he tries to negotiate her freedom, hoping to save her from life in hell.

Off Track is an honest, true-to-life depiction of illegal prostitution, bringing the story of Luuk and Soledad to a heart-breaking conclusion. In the tradition of Dutch film, Off Track doesn’t shy away from complex social issues and manages to challenge its viewers’ ideas about illegal prostitution.

Raw and uncompromising, Off Track follows the struggles of three friends backpacking through South America as their ideals and values are challenged following an encounter with a local prostitute.

Find Off Track on NPO3. Not available on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Germany: Head-On

Directed by: Fatih Akin, 2004.

World Cinema 002 - Germany (Head-On)
(Credit: Head-On / Gegen die Wand)

The history of the German film industry is one of the richest in Europe. In the years after World War I, Germany produced up to 250 films per year. The unstable political situation in the country during the 1930s and 1940s, however, led to a number of renowned filmmakers and actors leaving the country. Many of them established prosperous careers in the United States, such as director Fritz Lang and actress Marlene Dietrich. Though the country was able to re-establish its film industry after the war, German cinema never found its way back to the top.

From the 1980s onwards, a new wave of popular films revitalized the industry by harking back to the provocative nature of early German cinema, while establishing a new form of film. The original feel of German cinema was recaptured in films such as Run Lola Run (1998), Good Bye, Lenin! (2003) and Reclaim your Brain (2007).

Modern German films often take a critical look at current social and political issues. Spirited and rebellious, the films continuously question the German social system, making sure past mistakes are not repeated. Fatih Akin’s Head-On (original title: Gegen die Wand, 2004) combines the provocative nature of early German films with a story firmly rooted in the multicultural society of modern-day Germany. Head-On is a raw drama about Cahit, a nihilistic Turkish-German who has given up on life following the death of his wife, and Sibel, a woman trapped between traditional values and the modern world. The film shines a dark light on the lives of the immigrants living in Germany, sketching a modern love story within the framework of a broken society.

In Head-On, a forty-year-old addict is approached by a suicidal young woman requesting to set up a pretend marriage in order to break free from the strict rules of her conservative family.

Find Head-On on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

West-Germany: Wings of Desire

Directed by: Wim Wenders, 1987.

World Cinema 003 - West-Germany (Wings of Desire)
(Credit: Wings of Desire / Der Himmel über Berlin)

After World War II, Germany was split in two, as was its national film industry. In Berlin’s Soviet occupation zone, cinemas re-opened merely three weeks after Germany’s capitulation and the East-German film industry was given a strong boost by the ruling powers. On the other side of the wall, film production stagnated. Though both East and West eventually fully re-established their film industries, neither could fight off foreign competition.

Thanks in part due to its relations to the West, West-Germany was able to secure eight Academy Award-nominations between 1949 and 1990, while East-Germany was only nominated once in 1976 for the Holocaust film Jacob the Liar (1974). Only a few years before the fall of the Berlin Wall, director Wim Wenders filmed Wings of Desire (original title: Der Himmel über Berlin, 1987), a film depicting the lives of two immortal angels roaming around Berlin. Walking freely throughout the city and unbound by the wall, the angels reflect on the Germany that once was.

Wings of Desire offers an intriguing view of human existence through the eyes of Damiel, an angel who sheds his immortality to be with a lonely trapeze artist named Marion. Damiel’s confrontation with the limitations and harshness of his newfound humanity is beautifully sculpted throughout the film, offering an intriguing glimpse into the history of a once-divided nation.

Two angels, Damiel and Cassiel, wander around Berlin, listening to the many thoughts of the city’s inhabitants and offering comfort where needed. Becoming tired of his immortality, Damiel chooses to become human after falling in love with a beautiful trapeze artist.

Find Wings of Desire on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Belgium: Come as You Are

Directed by: Geoffrey Enthoven, 2011.

World Cinema 004 - Belgium (Come as You Are)
(Credit: Come as You Are / Hasta la Vista!)

Compared to other Western European countries, the Belgian film industry is characterized by its slow start. It wasn’t until the 1990s that the country’s cinematic landscape really came into bloom, producing Academy Award-nominated films such as Daens (1992) and Bullhead (2011). Belgium’s film industry perfectly reflects the state of the nation itself: the country’s cinematic landscape is linguistically and politically divided into two separate regions; the Flemish-speaking north and the French-speaking south.

The Flemish road comedy-drama Come As You Are (original title: Hasta la Vista!, 2011) crosses both the country’s linguistic border as well as its actual borders. In the film, three twentysomething men are paired up with a grumpy, French-speaking nurse hired to chaperone them on a road trip. Each of the men struggles with a physical handicap: Philip suffers from paraplegia, Jozef is almost completely blind and Lars has an incurable brain tumor, which paralyzed his body. Worried they might all die as virgins, the three friends plan to overcome their disabilities and travel to Spain, where they hope to visit a brothel specialized in taking care of “their kind of people”.

The film brilliantly balances the sadness of living with a handicap with a dose of true, heartfelt optimism. Come As You Are shows how a strong spirit, guided by undying friendship, can overcome any disability. Humorous and endearing, the film gives life to the obstinacy of these three special friends, doing what most non-disabled people can only dream of doing.

Come as You Are tells the story of three physically handicapped men and their chaperone, embarking on a unique road trip through France to Spain, hoping to finally lose their virginity in an accommodating Spanish brothel.

Find Come as you are on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

France: The Umbrellas of Cherbourg

Directed by: Jacques Demy, 1964.

World Cinema 005 - France (The Umbrellas of Cherbourg)
(Credit: The Umbrellas of Cherbourg / Les Parapluies de Cherbourg)

France is the birthplace of cinema. Auguste and Louis Lumière – together known as the Lumière brothers – screened the first 10 films ever made on 22 March 1895 in Paris. Their screening started with the short black-and-white silent documentary film Workers Leaving The Lumière Factory in Lyon (1895), which is considered to be the first film ever made. In the years that followed, the Lumière brothers would travel the world to introduce their new invention, and their trip sparked the dawn of many foreign film industries.

France continued to be at the forefront of development within the budding film industry, producing early success such as the adventure film A Trip to the Moon (1902) and the surrealist An Andalusian Dog (1929). To counter the onset of imported films, the French installed an import quota on foreign films after World War I. The quota indicated that for every seven foreign films imported into France, one French film was to be produced and screened in national cinemas.

The effects of this decision can still be felt today: France remains one of the strongest national film industries on the European continent. Counting the most Academy Award-nominations for Best Foreign Language Film ever and coming in second only to Italy in the number of wins, French cinema is a shining example of independent film production.

One of France’s most wonderful Academy Award-nominees is The Umbrellas of Cherbourg (original title: Les Parapluies de Cherbourg. 1964). The Umbrellas of Cherbourg is the antithesis to what we know about modern French film. French films often depict simple, yet captivating and emotional stories; a slice of life with a gut-wrenching twist, such as The Diving Bell and the Butterfly (2007). The Umbrellas of Cherbourg, however, is an all-out embracement of wonder.

Director Jacques Demy produced the film as a spiritual sequel to his film Lola (1961), which he often self-described as a “musical without music”. The Umbrellas of Cherbourg reuses the themes presented in Lola, but turns the film’s concept upside-down style-wise: were Lola was a black-and-white art-house film, The Umbrellas of Cherbourg became a meticulously designed splendor of color, combining a captivating musical vibe with a story of bittersweet passion.

A cinematic piece of art, The Umbrellas of Cherbourg tells the story of Geneviève, a young woman working in an umbrella boutique who is separated from her lover by the Algerian War.

Find The Umbrellas of Cherbourg on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Ireland: The Commitments

Directed by: Alan Parker, 1991.

World Cinema 006 - Ireland (The Commitments)
(Credit: The Commitments)

Though often used as a location for filming foreign productions, such as in John Ford’s The Quiet Man (1952) and the HBO series Game of Thrones (2011-2019), Ireland’s own national cinema is a young one. During the 1980s, American animator Don Bluth managed to produce a series of hit animation films from within the Irish Sullivan Bluth Studios. An American Tail (1986) and The Land Before Time (1988) became worldwide hits, and Irish animation film studio Cartoon Saloon would later lift Irish animation to new heights with titles such as The Secret of Kells (2009) and Song of the Sea (2014).

The country’s commercial production of fiction films equally didn’t start proper development until the late 20th century. One of Ireland’s early successes was Alan Parker’s The Commitments (1991), an uplifting musical comedy-drama based on Irish novelist Roddy Doyle’s novel of the same name. The Commitments is distinctively Irish at heart. The spirit and soul of the Irish can be felt throughout the narrative: positive, no matter the circumstances. Watching the film feels like visiting Dublin’s obscure bars, or staying up until dawn in busker paradise Galway: music seems to flow through the country’s veins.

Like many other Irish films, The Commitments focusses on the country’s working-class. Set in northern Dublin, the film details the formation of an Irish soul band under the lead of happy-go-lucky music fanatic Jimmy Rabbitte. The film follows Jimmy’s attempt to form a proper musical group out of a band of working-class misfits and manages to portrait a charming portrait of the country’s spirited youth.

Living in the slums of Dublin, Jimmy Rabbitte decides to put together an Irish soul band: the Commitments.

Find The Commitments on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

United Kingdom: Life of Brian

Directed by: Terry Jones, 1979.

World Cinema 007 - United Kingdom (Life of Brian)
(Credit: Monty Python’s Life of Brian)

The British film industry started operating in 1888, with the production of the world’s first moving pictures by Louis Le Prince. From the first British film, Incident at Clovelly Cottage (1895), to the poignant The Father (2020), Britain’s national film library is so extensive that choosing one definitive movie is nearly impossible: every choice would be a divisive one.

The United Kingdom produced mesmerizing classics such as The 39 Steps (1935), Lawrence of Arabia (1962), and A Clockwork Orange (1971) to franchise hits such as Dr. No (1962) and Harry Potter and the Philosopher’s Stone (2001), proving that British cinema is of limitless wealth. Successful throughout the decades – in part due to its collaborative nature with the United States and other English-speaking markets – the United Kingdom managed to secure itself a place at the top of the worldwide box office.

Known for its fish and chips, school uniforms, the Beatles, and an insurmountable dose of dry humor, British culture is reflected in every film genre from heavy drama to over-the-top action movies. Where the British film industry really excels, though, is when its directors present their deadpan humor in its purest form: comedy – dark or otherwise. Prime examples of British comedy can be found within the body of work put out by the comedy group Monty Python, consisting of John Cleese, Terry Gilliam, Graham Chapman, Eric Idle, Terry Jones, and Michael Palin.

Broadcast by the BBC, Monty Python’s Flying Circus (1969-1974) was an incredibly popular British sketch comedy series. Following their television work, the Pythons began making films, including 1979’s Monty Python’s Life of Brian (1979), a film every lover of British cinema should have seen at least once, because, “yes – [they] are all individuals!”

Brian of Nazareth, born in the stable next door to Jesus, becomes a reluctant Messiah after joining up with an anti-Roman political organization.

Find Monty Python’s Life of Brian on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Switzerland: My Life as a Courgette

Directed by: Claude Barras, 2016.

World Cinema 008 - Switzerland (My Life as a Courgette)
(Credit: My Life as a Courgette / Ma vie de Courgette)

Sandwiched between the Swiss Alps displayed in Philipp Stölzl’s Nord Face (2008), Switzerland has a relatively small film industry. Swiss national cinema is primarily influenced by the industries of its neighboring countries: France, Germany, and Italy. Like other European films, early Swiss productions mostly focused on the working class, who accounted for most of the paying audience.

Switzerland enhanced its film industry by co-producing several films with its surrounding neighbors. This led to the production of award-winning hits such as the Academy Award-nominated The Boat is Full (1981), a film about refugees seeking shelter in Switzerland during World War II. Still slowly growing its national film industry, Swiss films vary greatly in terms of content: the landlocked country’s multicultural nature – Switzerland has four official languages – is reflected in its output.

My Life as a Courgette (original title: Ma vie de Courgette, 2016) is a remarkable French-language stop-motion animated film, directed by Swiss animator Claude Barras. At first sight, My Life as a Courgette’s visually stunning pallet of colors hides the dark, sobering story of its main character Courgette. The opening scenes of the film, however, instantly reveal its true nature: My Life as a Courgette is an adult comedy-drama, filled with emotional depths not often found in an animated movie.

After losing his mother, a young boy nicknamed Courgette is sent to an orphanage, where he struggles to fit in amid the foster home’s equally traumatized children.

Find My Life as a Courgette on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

The Best Films from Southern Europe

After exploring the national cinema of Western Europe, we move onto the cinematic industry of Southern Europe. From the great epics of Italy to the colorful slice-of-life dramas of Spain, we finally reach the shores of Greece: the birthplace of theatre.

Italy: The Best of Youth

Directed by: Marco Tullio Giordana, 2003.

World Cinema 009 - Italy (The Best of Youth)
(Credit: The Best of Youth / La Meglio Gioventù)

The first Italian film was a short 1896 documentary showing Pope Leo XIII. Before the wars, the nation led the development of art cinema and pioneered many stylistic aspects of film. Italy was responsible for producing some of the world’s first blockbusters, such as Quo Vadis? (1913) and Cabiria (1914), making it one of the most renowned film-producing countries of its time.

Unfortunately, like in most other countries, Italy’s national film industry was brought to a grinding halt due to World War I. Re-establishing itself after World War II through the production of neorealist films, the country’s film industry survived by continuously reinventing itself. Moving from neorealist films to sword-and-sandal films and Spaghetti Westerns such as Sergio Leone’s A Fistful of Dollars (1964), Italy managed to stay relevant within the cinematic landscape.

Following the Academy Award-win for Cinema Paradiso (1988) in 1989, Italy’s national film industry was boosted by a generation of new talent. To detail the rich, yet the troublesome history of his country, director Marco Tullio Giordana adapted the tradition of several earlier Italian films: in The Best of Youth (original title: La Meglio Gioventù, 2003) he narrated Italian history through the eyes of one family.

Running at 366 minutes, The Best of Youth chronicles the lives of two Italian brothers and their families from 1966 through 2003. Balancing the family’s personal dramas with the political events that took place during the brothers’ lives, The Best of Youth paints a beautiful portrait of the shaping of modern-day Italy, in the form of a true Italian epic.

Spanning from 1966 to 2003, The Best of Youth follows the lives of two brothers as they live through some of the most tumultuous events of recent Italian history.

Find Act I and Act II of The Best of Youth on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Spain: Talk to Her

Directed by: Pedro Almodóvar, 2002.

World Cinema 010 - Spain (Talk to Her)
(Credit: Talk to Her / Hable Con Ella)

War and authoritarian rule long thwarted the proper development of Spain’s national film industry. The first Spanish film was released in 1897, and by 1914, Barcelona was the center of the Spanish film industry. Like their neighbors in Italy, Spanish studios produced many historical epics, such as The Life of Christopher Columbus and His Discovery of America (1917).

Following the Spanish transition to democracy in the mid-twentieth century, Spain began to collaborate with Italy to finance and produce a number of films. Additionally, countries such as the United States, Greece, the United Kingdom, and Mexico shot several films in Spain. The collaborative nature of the Spanish film industry in the early democratic era can still be seen in the production of several English-language films produced by Spain, such as The Machinist (2004) and The Impossible (2012).

Though co-producing many films with other countries for several decades, Spain was also able to establish its own national film industry. Following the general trend of European cinema, Spain produced mainly art films for niche markets. Spanish films are characterized by their absurdist, off-beat nature, often combining humor, drama, and romance, such as in Cows (1992), Unconscious (2004), and Km. 0 (2000).

Pedro Almodóvar’s Talk to Her (original title: Hable Con Ella, 2002) takes on a somewhat more serious tone, combining drama with an unconventional, off-beat romance. The film stars Spanish art-house actress Leonor Watling as Alicia Roncero, a beautiful dance student residing in a coma. Watling, who is equally famous for her talents as the lead singer of the jazzy band Marlango, is a familiar face within the Spanish film industry and can be seen in a large number of Spanish productions from the 2000s.

Male nurse Benigno dedicates his life to his only patient, Alicia, a young dancer in a coma. While at work, Benigno befriends Marco, who’s girlfriend is brought into the hospital in a comatose state after a bullfighter accident.

Find Talk to Her on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Greece: The Red Lanterns

Directed by: Vasilis Georgiadis, 1963.

World Cinema 011 - Greece (The Red Lanterns)
(Credit: The Red Lanterns / Ta Kokkina Fanaria)

The first Greek feature film, Kostas Bachatoris’ Golfo (1914), slowly started the nation’s film industry. Production truly took flight after the end of the 1919-1922 Greco-Turkish War, building up towards the country’s “Golden Age of Cinema” in the 1950s and 1960s. During this period Greece produced a series of internationally successful epics, such as Michael Cacoyannis’s Electra (1962) and Zorba the Greek (1964). Unconcerned with Communist influences like its surrounding countries, Greek films were generally more liberal in terms of story and characterization.

A classic example of these liberal, open-minded films is Vasilis Georgiadis’ The Red Lanterns (original title: Ta Kokkina Fanaria, 1963), which takes place inside one of Pireus’ many brothels. The film was the second Greek film to be nominated for the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film, and, though not a winner, was lauded around the world.

Set just before the ban on brothels in Troumba, Pireus, The Red Lanterns follows the daily lives of the brothel’s residents. Actress Tzeni Karezi takes center stage as the beautiful Eleni, who struggles to fend off the affections of her abusive “manager”. Eleni is surrounded by a diverse group of girls working in the home of Madam Pari, a former prostitute now running her own brothel. The girls’ stories are tales of hope and optimism, but also show clear signs of desperation, oppression, and inevitability.

The Red Lanterns follows the stories of five women working as prostitutes in a low-class brothel in Troumba, Pireus, in the period before the ban on prostitution forces the girls’ Madam to close down their house.

Not available on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

The Best Films from Northern Europe

Heading into Northern Europe, we start with Iceland in the North Atlantic, after which we’ll dock our boat in Denmark, take the Øresund Bridge to Sweden, and travel onwards to Norway and Finland, before heading into the Baltics to visit the former Soviet Republics Estonia and Lithuania.

Iceland: Reykjavík-Rotterdam

Directed by: Óskar Jónasson, 2008.

World Cinema 017 - Iceland (Reykjavík-Rotterdam)
(Credit: Reykjavík-Rotterdam)

It took some time before Icelandic cinema established itself internationally. In 1991, director Friðrik Þór Friðriksson’s Children of Nature (1991) was the first Islandic movie to receive an Academy Award nomination. Afterward, the country’s cinematic landscape started showing signs of growth. Iceland’s relative seclusion in the film market lies mostly in its geographical isolation and its small, thin-spread population. Counting less than 40 screens and producing less than 10 films per year, the country’s small but steady output is slowly gained traction.

With Reykjavík-Rotterdam (2008), director Óskar Jónasson bridged the gap between Iceland and mainland Europe, leading his characters on a high-risk voyage from their home island to the busy port of Rotterdam in the Netherlands. Jónasson assembled an all-star cast of Icelandic actors and with Reykjavík-Rotterdam, made one of the most expensive Icelandic films of all time.

The film was a great success, winning five Edda Awards in its home country and receiving the dubious honor of being remade in the United States under the title Contraband (2012). The remake, starring Mark Wahlberg, was directed by another successful Icelandic director, Baltasar Kormákur, who made a name for himself with films such as The Deep (2012) and Everest (2015). Quality-wise, Kormákur’s Contraband is no match for its predecessor, though. Reykjavík-Rotterdam easily overshadows the remake in terms of action, humor, and drama, unveiling a touch of what life is like beyond the sea.

Faced with money problems, a security guard accepts a smuggling job aboard a ship sailing from Reykjavík to Rotterdam.

Find Reykjavík-Rotterdam on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Denmark: Nymphomaniac, Vol. I & Vol. II

Directed by: Lars von Trier, 2013.

World Cinema 018 - Denmark (Nymphomaniac)
(Credit: Nymphomaniac)

Ever since director Peter Elfelt shot Denmark’s first film, Traveling with Greenlandic Dogs (1896), the country’s film industry has maintained a steady stream of film production. Denmark has a long history of off-beat, unconventional filmmaking, challenging social, religious, and moral themes.

In 1995, Danish directors Lars von Trier and Thomas Vinterberg started the Dogme 95 filmmaking movement to bring the art of filmmaking back to its core. The directors hoped to do this by embracing the profession’s traditional values and obscuring the use of elaborate special effects and advanced technology. Subversive and controversial, von Trier himself spent a lifetime making experimental films.

In 2013, von Trier concluded his thematic “Depression” trilogy with the two-part art film Nymphomaniac (2013). Though Nymphomaniac is not directly related to its predecessors – the controversial Antichrist (2009) and the enigmatic Melancholia (2011) all three films feature characters dealing with depression or grief.

Watching Nymphomaniac will be a true test of open-mindedness, as the film reads like a poetic presentation of a psychological study. The film starts by telling the story of the sexual awakening of a young woman, but progresses into more controversial territories as it goes on. Throughout its lengthy running time, Nymphomaniac continues to challenge viewers’ ideas and conceptions concerning several topics, from sadomasochism and abortion to the psychological issues of pedophiles. The film has the ability to offend every single conservative mind, but if you are willing and intrigued by the question of whether a child molester can be a victim of his own mind, this might be the right movie for you.

Running at over five hours, Nymphomaniac tells the story of a self-diagnosed nymphomaniac recounting her sexual experiences to the man who takes care of her after receiving a beating.

Find Nymphomaniac Part I and Part II on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Sweden: Force Majeure

Directed by: Ruben Östlund, 2014.

World Cinema 019 - Sweden (Force Majeure)
(Credit: Nymphomaniac)

Swedish cinema is inseparably connected with the name Ingmar Bergman, Sweden’s most famous and influential filmmaker. Winning the Academy Award for Best Foreign Language Film for two consecutive years with The Virgin Spring (1960) and Through a Glass Darkly (1961), Bergman paved the way for future generations of Scandinavian filmmakers. Just like many other European countries, Sweden upped its film production in the 1980s and hasn’t slowed down since.

A recent addition to Sweden’s director’s pool is Ruben Östlund. Östlund debuted making skiing films and documentaries, but broke through internationally with his feature film Force Majeure (original title: Turist, 2014). Much like the previously discussed Nymphomaniac, Force Majeure deals with some uncomfortable subject material. The film’s main storyline concerns the aftermath of an avalanche, during which a man prioritized his own escape over the safety of his family. The marital tension resulting from the man’s split-second decision derails the lives of the family.

One of the things that make Force Majeure so uncomfortable to watch is seeing just how destructive human emotion can be. Our lack of communication, our sense of self-worth… Force Majeure brings its core characters spiraling down a deep hole they might never climb out of – not by major conflict, not by a series of life-changing events, but simply through their own, flawed humanity.

A family vacation in the French Alps takes an unexpected turn when a man prioritized his own escape over the safety of his family during an avalanche.

Find Force Majeure on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Norway: Kon-Tiki

Directed by: Joachim Rønning & Espen Sandberg, 2012.

World Cinema 020 - Norway (Kon-Tiki)
(Credit: Kon-Tiki)

Norwegian cinema started several years after the film industries of its surrounding countries. The first local film was the documentary short The Dangers in a Fisherman’s Life (1907). Though not as prolific or revered as its neighboring countries’, Norway’s cinematic output has been a notable player on the international market for some time. With Kon-Tiki (2012), directors Joachim Rønning and Espen Sandberg brought a unique part of Norwegian history to the big screen and were awarded for it with a series of nominations. Taking place far away from the country’s icy shores, Kon-Tiki is set in the middle of the Pacific Ocean.

The Kon-Tiki expedition was a 1947 journey across the Pacific Ocean, led by Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdahl. Heyerdahl aimed to prove the possibility that Polynesia had first been settled by people from South America, rather than people migrating from the west. His beliefs were based on the similarities between the cultures of Peru and Polynesia, as well as several native legends detailing a conflict between the Hanau epe and Hanau momoko tribes.

To prove his theory, Heyerdahl – played by Pål Sverre Valheim Hagen in the film – set out on a journey to sail the Pacific on a pae-pae raft, which he named after the Inca god of sun and storm, Kon-Tiki. Along with his crew of five men, he voyaged the ocean on the steerless raft, left to perils of the open sea. Kon-Tiki shows the great challenges Heyerdahl and his crew went through in proving what nobody in the world wanted to believe.

To complement your viewing experience, also watch Heyerdahl’s own documentary Kon-Tiki (1950), which details the sea voyage through his own lens.

To prove that it was possible for South Americans to first settle in Polynesia, Norwegian explorer Thor Heyerdal sets out to sail 6,900 km across of the Pacific Ocean on a balsawood raft.

Find Kon-Tiki on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Finland: Rare Exports, Inc.

Directed by: Jalmari Helander, 2003.

World Cinema 021 - Finland (Rare Exports, Inc)
(Credit: Rare Exports, Inc.)

After the Lumière brothers screened their films in Helsinki in 1896, it took almost a decade for Finland to produce its first local film, Novelty from Helsinki: School youth at break (1904). Regular film production started in the 1920s, and the country’s film industry slowly developed throughout the silent era into the Finnish “Golden age of Cinema” in the 1930s. After a decline in success in later years, the industry was revitalized under influence of the French New Wave movement of the 1960s and received a second boost by the European surge of national cinemas in the late 1990s.

Running at a mere 8 minutes, Rare Exports, Inc. (2003) is by far the shortest recommendation on this list. Carefully crafted by Jalmari Helander, the short film turns Finland’s legendary status as the home of Santa Clause upside down. Rare Exports, Inc. follows the efforts of three skilled hunters venturing into the woods to capture a rare and dangerous prey. The question as to what exactly they are hunting – and why – is part of what makes Rare Exports, Inc. such a great little dark fantasy film.

Dark, surprising, and funny, Rare Exports, Inc. serves as one of the best anti-holiday movies. The short’s brilliant pacing combined with its documentary-style storytelling offers a rare and unconventional take on the Christmas festival. Though Helander’s feature film career never really took off, Rare Exports, Inc. did spawn both a sequel titled Rare Exports: The Official Safety Instructions (2005) and the full-length feature film Rare Exports: A Christmas Tale (2010). Both were directed by Helander himself.

Rare Exports, Inc. is the perfect film for you if you wish to have a full cinematic experience in under ten minutes. The short combines a sense of wonder with the thrills of a horror movie and the laughs of a solid dark comedy. Do watch the short film first before turning your attention towards the feature-length version; the initial reveal is just too good to be spoiled.

Three elite hunters venture into the bitter cold woods of Lapland, to track down and capture a rare and dangerous prey for the Christmas season.

Watch Rare Exports, Inc. on Vimeo. Not available on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Estonia: In the Crosswind

Directed by: Martti Helde, 2014.

World Cinema 022 - Estonia (In the Crosswinds)
(Credit: In the Crosswind / Risttuules)

A short ferry ride from Finland, Estonia is the most Northern of the three Baltic states in Europe. Occupied by Germany, Denmark, Sweden, and Russia even before World War II’s Soviet occupation began, Estonia finally declared independence in 1991. During it’s earlier, short-lasting period of independence between 1918 to 1934, Estonian director Konstantin Märska produced and directed the country’s first full-length feature film Shadow of the Past in 1924.

Estonia’s national film industry followed the same path as that of the Polish film industry: the end of Stalinism allowed filmmakers to become more liberal and the country’s declaration of independence in 1991 opened up the market for independent filmmakers. During this period, however, the cost of filmmaking skyrocketed and Estonia’s output declined dramatically. In 1996, no feature films were produced at all.

After the 1990s, Estonia’s national film industry once again showed signs of growth. One of the country’s – and perhaps, all of Europe’s – most unique films is director Martti Helde’s In the Crosswind (original title: Risttuules, 2014). In the Crosswind is a beautifully sculptured three-dimensional photograph of the emotional and tragic mass deportation of Estonians to Siberia during World War II. Helde’s black and white tableaux vivant is both mesmerizing and hypnotic, and fashions an eerie portrait of a dark page in Estonia’s history.

In the Crosswind recounts the tragic deportation that took place in the early morning of June 14, 1941. Ordered by Stalin to remove the political opponents of the Soviet government, more than 40,000 people from Estonia, Latvia, and Lithuania were deported to Siberia.

Find In the Crosswind on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Lithuania: Forest of the Gods

Directed by: Algimantas Puipa, 2005.

World Cinema 023 - Lithuania (Forest of the Gods)
(Credit: Forest of the Gods / Dievu Miskas)

The history of Lithuania’s cinematic landscape is very similar to that of Estonia’s film industry. In the early 20th century, Lithuania mainly produced short films, but during the country’s short-lived independence in the 1920s, several feature-length films were produced. Similar to Estonia and Latvia, Lithuania was occupied by both the Soviets and the Germans during World War II, and after the war ended the Soviet Union had once again reoccupied the small nation.

Following the same path as other Soviet-occupied nations, Lithuania’s film industry’s output was embedded in Communist ideals, but became more liberal after the death of Stalin and was eventually liberated from censorship after the country gained independence in 1990. With independence came a heavy decrease in state funding due to financial issues, drastically dropping the number of movies the Lithuanian film industry was able to produce. Nowadays, the country produces an average of two films per year.

One of Lithuania’s modern-day successes is Algimantas Puipa’s Forest of the Gods (original title: Dievu Miskas, 2005), a film highlighting a different aspect of the mass deportation depicted in Estonia’s In the Crosswind. Forest of the Gods is based on the novel The Forest of the Gods by Lithuanian poet Balys Sruoga. Sruoga based the novel on his experiences as a political prisoner in the Stutthof concentration camp during World War II. Stutthof was built on the former site of the Forest of the Gods, which was leveled by the Nazis to construct the camp. During the war, an estimated 63,000 to 65,000 prisoners died in Stutthof. Due to Soviet censorship, Sruoga’s novel was not published until after Stalin’s death in 1957…

A university professor is sent to a Nazi concentration camp as a ‘political safety arrest’, where he details the ongoing struggles of the camp’s prisoners and sheds light on its many inhabitants.

Find Forest of the Gods on Amazon.com.

^ Back to Start ^

Looking for something else? Check out our recommendation for the best films from Eastern Europe, films from Africa, films from South Asia, films from West and Central Asia, films from East and Southeast Asia, films from Oceania and the Pacific, films from North America, films from Central America and the Caribbean and films from South America.

More articles on Movies

Cinema of Europe Read More »

Famous Stuffed Animals

The Most Icon Stuffed Animals in Film and TV

Stuffed animals can be found in all layers of society. They have proven be extremely diligent, hard-working and universally skilled. There are stuffed animals working as mascots, comforters, influencers and even as astronauts. Some plushies, however, were born to act. We’ve listed a few of the most memorable plushie roles in films and TV.

Teddy (Mr. Bean, 1990-1995)

British sitcom Mr. Bean (1990-1995) featured Rowan Atkinson as the hilarious Mr. Bean, a clumsy “child in a grown man’s body”, who’s buffoonery gets him in all sort of problems. Bean is often completely unaware of the way the world around him works, and he often had serious problems in completing simple tasks. The plushie star of the show is Bean’s loyal sidekick, a knitted brown teddy bear with button eyes and sausage-shaped limbs. Teddy’s role in the show required some serious acting chops, as the little bear’s character has been decapitated, shrunken in the wash and used as a paintbrush. We just hope he got some good wages and a generous retirement package!

Famous Plushies - Teddy (Mr. Bean)
The hard life of a sitcom-plushie (Credit: Tiger Aspect Productions / IVT)

Lots-O’-Huggin’ Bear (Toy Story 3, 2010)

As with human actors, some plushies are frequently type-cast. Stuffed animals usually wind up playing cute background characters, such as the pile of stuffed animals in which the titular character in the movie E.T. the Extra-Terrestrial (1982) hid. Lots-O’-Huggin’ Bear – Lotso for short – was one of those plushie actors who broke the mold and turned things around. The pink bear played the main villain in Toy Story 3 (2010), which allowed him to truly show how skilled some plushie actors can be. Still, even Lotso had to fight his way to stardom: Lotso appeared in Toy Story (1995), Toy Story 2  (1999) and Up (2009) before getting a starring role.

Famous Plushies - Lotso (Toy Story 3)
Not all plushies are cuddly (Credit: Pixar Animation Studios)

Winnie-the-Pooh (Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree, 1966-Present)

In 1966, Walt Disney Productions created a short film based upon the Winnie-the-Pooh books by A. A. Milne, titled Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree. The film was a major success, which sparked two sequels and a feature film combining all three stories in 1977. The franchise continued to expand with over a dozen films, tv series and spin-offs, all starring a fictionalized version of the world’s most famous plushie, Winnie-the-Pooh. The Disney franchise featured a host of over plushies: Piglet, Eeyore, Kanga and Roo, Tigger and Rabbit made the transition from the books to the media franchise and characters Owl and Gopher were added to the mix.

Famous Plushiea - Winnie-the-Pooh (Winnie the Pooh and the Honey Tree)
Winnie-the-Pooh became a member of the Disney-family (Credit: Walt Disney Animation Studios)

Fluffy Nijdam (Eight, 2008)

Leopard plushie Fluffy was discovered in the discount bin of a Dutch toy shop. He instantly landed himself the role of Fluffy H. Nijdam in the 2008 drama Eight. Fluffy earned his first name and middle initial to the film’s prop master, who purchased the plushie along with a set of fluffy pink handcuffs to be used in one of the film’s scenes. Fluffy went on to become an avid traveler, visiting over 50 countries and starting the Instagram account The Bite-Sized Backpacker.

Famous Plushies - Fluffy Nijdam (Eight)
Fluffy traveling behind-the-screens during the production of Eight (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

Artemis Clyde Frog (South Park, 1998-2011)

The animated sitcom South Park (1998-Present) never been shy of profanity and satire. One of the shows’ most deprived characters is Eric Cartman, a loud, obnoxious, and amoral child with a bad temper. Still, like every other child, Cartman holds a soft spot for his stuffed animals. (Artemis) Clyde Frog lives with Rumpertumskin, Polly Prissypants, Peter Panda, and Muscleman Marc in Cartman’s home in South Park. Though Clyde Frog got to show of his acting abilities every once in a while, his character was killed off in Season Fifteen of the show after a dispute with Cartman. Cartman murdered the little frog to say goodbye to his childhood, framing Polly Prissypants for the deed.

Famous Plushies - Clyde Frog (South Park)
Clyde Frog is brutally murdered on South Park (Credit: South Park Studios)

Feigenbaum (Angel, 2004)

Fluffy bunny Feigenbaum was the second plushie actor in Joss Whedon’s Buffyverse, following up on the appearances of pig plushie Mr. Gordo in three episodes of Buffy the Vampire Slayer (1997-2003) between 1997 and 1999. Feigenbaum starred in the Season Five of the fantasy spin-off series Angel (1999-2004). In the series, he played the stuffed rabbit of scientist Winifred “Fred” Burkle. Fred affectionately referred to the little bunny as “the master of chaos”, due to him being named after Mitchell Jay Feigenbaum, a mathematical physicist and pioneer in the studies of chaos theory. In the series, Feigenbaum tragically survived his owner, after she was killed by an ancient demon. Feigenbaum’s short stint on the series was able to draw quite a few tears.

Famous Plushies - Feigenbaum (Angel)
Winifred “Fred” Burkle holds Feigenbaum (Credit: 20th Century Fox Television / The WB)

Muffin (The Dark Diamond, 2004 | Luke and Lucy: The Texas Rangers, 2009)

Luke and Lucy, previously known as Spike and Suzy in British and as Willy and Wanda in American, are a Flemish comic series duo. Together, they have starred in close to 400 comic book albums, a TV series and both a live-action movie and an animated film. Lucy’s best friend and “spiritual daughter” is the small female ragdoll Muffin (also knowns as Molly of Sawdust). Muffin plays a large role in many of the albums, serving as a catalyst for the main story arc, or coming alive through magic or science. She made her cinematic appearance in The Dark Diamond (2004) and is still standing strong since her first comic book appearance in 1946.

Famous Plushies - Muffin (Willy and Wanda)
Muffin, Willy, Wanda and Tobias as drawn by Paul Geerts (Credit: Studio Vandersteen)

Ted (Ted, 2011-2015)

Ted, a large fluffy bear, landed a role in the titular film Ted (2011) by Seth MacFarlane. In the film, Ted plays himself as a character who was wished to life by his human friend. Unfortunately, Ted grew up to be a cheeky but crude and foul-mouthed bear with a drinking problem. Ted and his co-star Mark Wahlberg were able to pull in the masses of the box office, and were called back to do a sequel in 2015.

Famous Plushies - Ted (Ted)
Ted: a bear with a beer (Credit: Media Rights Capital / Fuzzy Door Productions / Bluegrass Films / Smart Entertainment)

Pooky (The Garfield Show, 2008-2016)

In October 1978, the famously lazy orange cat Garfield discovered teddy bear Pooky in a cupboard. The little teddy quickly became Garfield’s best friend. Pooky made several appearances on the 3D-animated The Garfield Show (2009-2016), where he, much like other famous acting teddy bears, was subjected to some abuse. No worries, though: Pooky has his own stand-in stuntman, and was well taken care of during production.

Famous Plushies - Pooky (Garfield)
Garfield meets Pooky for the first time (Credit: Random House)

Which famous acting plushie do you think should be added to the list?

Adopt a celebrity plushie

Most of the celebrity plushies from this blog were made available as real-life stuffed animals. From teddy bears Teddy and Pookie to the cheeky Ted and the full cast of Toy Story and Winnie-the-Pooh, you can add these famous cuddlers to your collection!

By purchasing your new stuffed animal through our site, you’ll directly contribute to the protection of the world’s wild cats and the preservation of their habitats. Of course, you can also buy another cute stuffed animal!

Browse Amazon’s full range of Disney plushies:

Logo Amazon COM

Stuffed Animals: Related Articles

The Most Icon Stuffed Animals in Film and TV Read More »

Love in the MCU

Love in the MCU: The role of Marvel’s supporting women in the Cinematic Universe

Avengers: Endgame presented audiences worldwide with a quick look at what might be in store for the future of the Marvel Cinematic Universe: during the epic final battle on the remains of the Avengers facility most of the MCU’s women united in a single shot to make their stand against the genocidal Thanos. Combined with the arrival of Captain Marvel a few months prior, as well as the re-introduction of Thor’s Jane in Thor: Love and Thunder, Marvel Studios is showing an increased focus on women in their ever-expanding world. This hasn’t always been the case, though – in fact, the early MCU films indicated the exact opposite…

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Marvel Studios)

Phase One: The Love Interests

Between 2008 and 2011, Phase One introduced the main Avengers, as well as their love interest. For Tony Stark there was his trusted personal assistant Pepper Potts, Bruce Banner found peace in the arms of cellular biologist Betty Ross, Thor shared his time on Earth with scientist Jane Foster and Steve Rogers fell for officer Peggy Carter of the Strategic Scientific Reserve. All four characters were portrayed as smart, independent, and successful women, yet their stories – and their positions within MCU society – were only there to support the emotional development of their masculine counterparts.

Though on paper Pepper, Betty, Jane, and Peggy had much to offer, the scale and scope of the expanding MCU didn’t allow them many opportunities for growth. 2012’s team-up The Avengers side-lined the latter three and granted Pepper only a small cameo. Still, despite having only a small cameo in the film, Pepper proved to be the most resilient female (side) character the MCU had to offer.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Captain America: The First Avenger)

Phase Two: The Moral Support

As a whole, the Marvel Cinematic Universe focuses mainly on action and adventure. This is partly why Phase Two struggled to find a place for its female characters in its storylines. Phase One’s women had served their purpose as love interests once the curtains closed. Having guided Marvel’s leading heroes on their path to heroism, it was unclear what their role would be in further installments. The MCU’s writers only partly found an answer to this problem, side-lining some characters and changing the role of others.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Iron Man 3)

During Phase One’s Iron Man 2 Pepper was promoted to CEO of Stark Industries, granting her more responsibility and allowing her to grow as a female professional within the series. By the end of the film, however, she became romantically involved with Tony. This turned her into the emotional anchor the writers needed to allow the hero to grow as an individual in both The Avengers as well as Iron Man 3. In The Avengers Pepper’s cameo served to highlight the emotional impact of the sacrifice Stark was ready to make by the end of the film. Her role in Phase Two continued to be one of support: she was the voice in Stark’s head, steering him clear of his mistakes and taking on the responsibilities Stark no longer wished to deal with. Momentarily, Iron Man 3 offered the promise of radical change for the character when Pepper gained her own set of superpowers through the Extremis virus, but a short voice-over by Stark at the closure of the film cleared her of her heroic potential, leaving her once again by the side-lines once Avengers: Age of Ultron came around.

Much like Pepper, Jane was also granted a larger role in Phase Two. She became a key figure in the main storyline of Thor: The Dark World. Having served their purpose in the hero’s solo outings, however, both women were (again) side-lined in Age of Ultron. Their absence was explained away with a particularly lazy piece of writing: during a scene set at a victory party, both characters were said to be unable to attend the festivities due to the responsibilities arising from their (successful) professional careers. Though the few lines of dialogue granted the women a bit of off-screen development, the scene only served as a quick explanation why neither one of them showed up in the film. Though contrasting gender roles and portraying Pepper and Jane as strong, independent women, the scene also signaled a sore point within the MCU: it gave a clear indication that women were not being given their due within the series and were not deemed important enough to carry over into the team-up films. Leaving the characters out of the Avengers series was a simple, cost-effective choice, which heavily contrasted the concept of the MCU’s female characters as “successful women”: the characters were not needed to support the film’s main storyline and were thus left out.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Thor: The Dark World)

Still, it was Betty and Peggy who really got the short end of the stick. After The Avengers traded Edward Norton in for Mark Ruffalo as the Hulk, all characters from 2008’s The Incredible Hulk were quickly swept under the rug and Betty was never mentioned again. Meanwhile, Peggy had aged significantly since the events of Captain America: The First Avenger and was replaced by Natasha Romanoff in Captain America: The Winter Soldier. Despite not having any sort of romantic relationship with Steve Rogers, she still managed to lock lips with the hero before the closing credits.

Halfway through Phase Two, a new, more sustainable kind of love interest was introduced into the MCU in the shape of alien warrior Gamora. Debuting in 2014’s Guardians of the Galaxy, Gamora had a stronger resemblance to Black Widow than to the previously mentioned MCU women. Rather than serving mainly as a love interest, Gamora was introduced as a full-fledged (main) character, acting independently from the narrative’s hero. Both the introduction of Black Widow in Iron Man 2 and that of Gamora, however, were still infused with the tendency of having the female character lean towards a romantic relationship with the film’s main protagonist. In fact, in spite of being a badass superspy, Natasha herself played the role of “the girl” four times over, fluttering her eyelashes at Tony in Iron Man 2, supporting Steve in The Winter Soldier, making out with Bruce in Age of Ultron and sacrificing herself for Clint in Endgame.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Guardians of the Galaxy)

After Age of Ultron, Phase Two’s closing chapter Ant-Man introduced yet another successful businesswoman into the Cinematic Universe: Hope van Dyne, the senior board member of Pym Technologies. Hope’s playful relationship with main hero Scott indicated a slight change in the way the MCU treated their love interests, giving her a storyline of her own; one that wasn’t necessarily connected to that of Scott. Both Hope and Gamora’s storylines focussed on familial love towards their parents/siblings, which helped sustain their independent arcs throughout the series.

Phase Three: Love in the Age of Heroes

Age of Ultron’s handling of the MCU’s supporting women didn’t promise much for the characters’ further development. Phase Three-opener Captain America: Civil War only made things worse. Peggy died off-screen and the void she left behind was filled by what would become the MCU’s most clunky, shoe-horned on-screen romance when Steve started dating Peggy’s niece Sharon – who in turn was completely forgotten after the character shared her first kiss with the hero. Peggy lived on in flashbacks, as well as her own TV series, but her impact on the cinematic side of the MCU was reduced to that of a memory: she became a symbol of hope for Steve; something to help him remember who he was and what he was fighting for.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Captain America: Civil War)

Despite Civil War‘s strong focus on Tony Stark as the main character, Pepper was once again left out of the character-heavy drama. Story-wise, this made sense, since her character had always served as Stark’s voice of reason. If she had shown up as Tony’s moral compass in either Age of Ultron or Civil War, she would have easily been able to suppress most of Tony’s emotional impulses, which drove the overarching plot of both films. Though she starred in more MCU films than any other supporting female character, Pepper’s storyline was completely dictated by the needs of the man she was written to love. Small roles in Spider-Man: Homecoming and Avengers: Infinity War re-introduced Pepper as the fiancée of a more grown-up and responsible Iron Man, who, by the start of Avengers: Endgame settled down with Potts to start a family. Again, Pepper played Tony’s voice of reason.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Jane’s absence from the silver screen continues throughout Phase Three when, despite being an important part of Thor’s backstory on Earth, the character was once again put to pasture in Thor: Ragnarok. In the film, Thor states that they broke up following his quest for the infinity stones, which seemed a bit off-mark after the couple’s hopeful reunion at the end of The Dark World. Endgame further turned their relationship into a joke when Thor comically reminisced about their relationship.

Doctor Strange and Spider-Man: Homecoming introduced a new love interest into the MCU and Ant-Man and the Wasp added significant weight to the role of Hope van Dyne. Overall though, the importance of love and romantic relationships was heavily downplayed within the MCU, as the portrayal – or lack thereof – of Jane, Pepper, Betty, and Peggy had already signaled in the early Phase Three films.

Most relationships formed within the later movies of the MCU bloomed and perished off-screen, such as in the case of Thor and Jane, Bruce and Natasha, and Steve and Sharon. Other relationships, such as the romances between Wanda and Vision, Gamora and Peter, and the re-kindled relationship between Pepper and Tony mostly developed off-screen and, once their love turned into a serious commitment, quickly ended in tragic death.

Instead of focussing on romantic relationships, which hadn’t always worked out in earlier films, Phase Three placed a stronger focus on platonic, friendly relationships by embracing a series of odd character pairings. Examples are the relationships between Steve and Sam and Steve and Tony (Civil War), Thor and Bruce (Ragnarok), Tony and Peter (Homecoming), T’Challa and Everett (Black Panther), Thor and Rocket (Infinity War), and Carol and Nick (Captain Marvel). Most of the latter Phase Three movies heavily downplayed further romantic storylines. Spider-Man: Far From Home, strongly supported this more loose stance on romance by ridiculing the feeble nature of teenage relationships through Betty and Ned’s flash-in-the-pan relationship.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Phase Four: The Continued Development of the Buddy Movie

In short, Phase One treated its supporting female cast as most blockbusters do. Though most of the films portrayed their female characters as successful individuals, they were mostly there to support the male heroes, taking on stereotypical gender roles. Due to the often unsustainable nature of such characters over the course of a longer narrative – once the curtains fell on a kiss, their roles were pretty much played out – the MCU struggled to find a place for its established “lovers” in Phase Two. Since none of the Phase One women had their own, independent storylines to justify their presence in further movies, they were either cast aside or reshaped for further outings. New heroines, such as Gamora and Hope were given meatier roles during their first appearance, shaping them as individual characters to prevent such issues from arising in the sequels that would inevitably follow. This, however, also meant taking a step back from the concept of “love” as the main theme within the storylines of the male leads. To balance out the plot, the main protagonists of Phase Three were given strong secondary leads to bounce off.

Love in the MCU
(Credit: Black Widow)

What does this all mean for the women of the MCU going forward? Looking at Phase Four, it seems like the MCU will continue to up the antenna on cross-over movies like Ragnarok, linking Doctor Strange to the Scarlet Witch and the Falcon to the Winter Soldier. It is very likely more announcements regarding intriguing character pairings are bound to follow for both Phase Four and Five.

As for the concept of love in the MCU, Taika Waititi surprised everyone by convincing Natalie Portman to return to the role of Jane Foster for Love and Thunder. Portman, whose character stemmed from Phase One, had previously indicated to be unhappy with her involvement in the MCU – which is understandable given her character’s initial strictly gender-based role in the franchise. Phase Four, however, seems to be making a new promise towards the MCU’s female characters: Marvel will finally allow its women to shine on their own, by raising Natasha Romanoff to the role of titular heroine in Black Widow (after a decade of playing second fiddle to her male colleagues) and by bringing Jane Foster back in a big way for Love and Thunder, giving her the attention she had long deserved.

What are your thoughts on the portrayal of the MCU’s supporting female cast?

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

Love in the MCU: The role of Marvel’s supporting women in the Cinematic Universe Read More »

Avengers - Endgame

Avengers: Endgame: Did the Russo Brothers turn the Avengers into the MCU’s primary antagonists?

Did the Russo Brothers turn Earth’s mightiest heroes into Earth’s greatest foes with Avengers: Infinity War and Avengers: Endgame? After casting the Avengers in the role of Thanos’ primary antagonists in Infinity War, the story the Russo Brothers projected on the silver screen with Endgame seems to solidify the idea that the Avengers might actually be the cause of some of the worse disasters in the history of the universe.

At the end of Avengers: Infinity War, Thanos snapped his fingers, erasing 50% of all life across the universe with the combined power of the six Infinity Stones. Though the consequences of his act are debatable – Thanos basically ruined yogurt, doomed near-extinct species, and destroyed half our livestock and resources – he was the primary antagonist of the film, and thus its prevailing hero. Thanos’ quest to collect the Infinity Stones follows the same narrative structure as that of any other film’s protagonist, and though they weren’t wearing black hats, the Avengers fulfilled their role as the Titan’s sworn enemies, eventually biting the dust during the film’s climactic final battle. Though this can easily be written off as a fresh take on the genre and a change of perspectives, Avengers: Endgame hinted more directly at the damaging “heroism” of Earth’s mightiest heroes.

Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

After a long year of waiting, we finally got to see the aftermath of the Decimation. The severe ramifications of the universe-wide event are shown to have changed the lives of everyone we know. In Endgame, the Avengers are once again returned to the seats of the film’s protagonist. The story the Russo Brothers told, however, reveals the team’s questionable motivations. No matter how many faults Thanos’ initial plan showed, the scary thing was that his genocidal philosophy did make sense… and in Endgame, the Titan continues to display more objectivity in the matter than his opponents, who are clearly motivated by emotion.

Imagine all that happened during the five-year gap between Infinity War and Endgame: no matter how ravaging the Decimation was, people always find a way to cope with tragedy. Five years is a long time in terms of dealing with loss and, as survivors, most individuals will have tried to move on with their lives by the time Scott returns from the Quantum Realm. Even most of the Avengers themselves have moved on: Steve is counseling others in dealing with their loss, Bruce has reinvented himself and seems to be doing more than fine, and Tony and Pepper have settled down in a beautiful countryside house where they raise their daughter Morgan Stark. Natasha, Clint, and Thor have more problems dealing with their losses; rather than focussing on what remains, they linger on what they have lost; in other words: the passage of time has not been able to help them cope with their grief. In clinical psychology, this is known as “complicated grief”, a condition in which people still struggle to recover after a great loss more than two years after the event.

Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Iron Man 3)

The emotional pain felt by the grieving Avengers is what drives the main storyline of Endgame; even Tony is ultimately motivated by the idea of being able to bring back his protégée Peter. Together, the Avengers align once again, ultimately reversing the Decimation and bringing everyone who was killed by Thanos back to life in the year 2023.

Meanwhile, however, the world had already moved on. For most beings in the universe, it does not lie within their power to restore the universe. Having dealt with their losses, the only choice they had was to move on: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. When the Hulk snaps his fingers in 2023, he resurrects every person, animal, alien, and yogurt bacteria that had been erased five years ago. It sounds nice, looks spectacular, and brings tears to our eyes – phones start ringing, heroes and friends reunite… but the consequences of the second snap are not to be overlooked.

Imagine a world catering to a certain amount of individuals, producing a certain amount of food and medications, providing a certain amount of electricity and water… A world with a certain capacity for schooling and labor, where enough houses, buildings, supermarkets, and shops are maintained to tailor to a certain amount of people… and then doubling the population of that world within the snap of a finger.

Mortgages have not been paid. Houses have been sold. There’s an enormous shortage in toilet paper. Life has become fully tailored to providing for 50% of what once was the world’s population. Reintroducing those that were snapped out of existence into a world that has been doing fine without them for five whole years heralds more ramifications than just awkward age differences: famine alone could lead to a universe-wide extinction-level event.

Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

During the final confrontation, Steve and Thanos discuss the fate of the universe. Though Steve’s cause in fighting Thanos might be just, he is far from right. During Endgame, the Avengers act with their hearts rather than with their minds. Tony, who ultimately gave his life to save the day, is the primary cause of all of this: in wishing to allow his daughter to live, he doomed the universe by disrupting the flow of the entire universe by letting Hulk snap everyone back in 2023, rather than undoing the Snap right after it happened.

The Russo Brothers’ heroic tale has a dark side which, in all likelihood, will be ignored in further movies. A thoughtful look at the Infinity Saga, however, shows us that perhaps it wasn’t the best idea to let the fate of the universe rest on the shoulders of the Avengers…

Have you seen Avengers: Endgame? How do you feel about the decisions the team made in the film?

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

Avengers: Endgame: Did the Russo Brothers turn the Avengers into the MCU’s primary antagonists? Read More »

Fluffy in Dubrovnik

Stuffed animal asks Daenerys Targaryen to bend the knee

Currently, in the midst of its final season, people around the world are under the spell of HBO’s Game of Thrones. It seems, though, that it doesn’t stop there! On Instagram, Globetrotting stuffed animal Fluffy, also known as The Bite-Sized Backpacker, decided to visit some of the popular fantasy series’ most iconic locations in Dubrovnik, Croatia… and in doing so, he (nicely) requested Daenerys to bend the knee.

Fluffy on the Iron Throne
Fluffy on the Iron Throne (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

The fluffy Instagrammer’s origins lie within the world of film itself: after serving as a prop in a local amateur film, Fluffy became a travel mascot, visiting over 400 destinations in 46 countries, as he describes on his website thebitesizedbackpacker.com.

Recently, Fluffy visited the Croatian coastal city of Dubrovnik, which was used to bring the iconic scenery of King’s Landing to life in the popular TV series based on the books written by George R. R. Martin. The view from Fortress Lovrijenac – used for filming scenes set within the Red Keep – shows the wonderfully iconic scenery of Dubrovnik.

Fluffy in Dubrovnik
Fluffy in Dubrovnik (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

Fluffy’s Game of Thrones tour included a number of famous places. He visited the Dubrovnik West Harbour (“Blackwater Bay”), where Stannis Baratheon was defeated during the Battle of Blackwater Bay and climbed the steps near the bay where part of the “slaughter of the innocents” was filmed; the massacre of Robert Baratheon’s bastards to erase Joffrey’s competition for the throne.

Fluffy in Dubrovnik
Fluffy in Dubrovnik (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

Just off the coast of the city, Fluffy visited the island of Lokrum, where many scenes were filmed for Daenerys Targaryen’s stopover in the city of Qarth in the show’s second season.

Fluffy in Dubrovnik
Fluffy observing Lokrum Island (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)
Fluffy on Lokrum Island
Fluffy on Lokrum Island (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

Dubrovnik wasn’t the cuddly traveler’s first rodeo as a film location tourist: Fluffy previously visited several locations from the Lord of the Rings trilogy in New Zealand, including the lovely Hobbiton, and visited the Old Royal Naval College in Greenwich, where Malekith the Accursed crashed down on Earth to wreak havoc in Thor: The Dark World.

Fluffy in Greenwich
Fluffy lands in the same spot as Thor in Greenwich (Credit: The Bite-Sized Backpacker)

Are you an avid film location hunter? Would you love to explore Dubrovnik for yourself? And most importantly: will you bend the knee?

More articles on Movies

Stuffed animal asks Daenerys Targaryen to bend the knee Read More »

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers - Endgame

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame

One of the fantastic ways in which Avengers: Endgame deals with the fallout of Avengers: Infinity War is by showing the emotional struggles of the original Avengers in the gloomy first act of the film. Whether coincidentally or intended, each of the main Avenger’s story arcs within the opening act of the film represents one of the five stages of grief, as proposed by the Kübler-Ross model.

The Kübler-Ross model separates five chronological emotional states experienced by terminally ill individuals: denial, anger, bargaining, depression, and acceptance. In modern culture, the model is also used as a model for the stages of depression or dealing with tragedy.

In Avengers: Endgame, Thor’s storyline embodies the stage of denial. Hawkeye’s story reflects the stage of anger, and in turn, Steve is struggling within the bargaining stage. Natasha is coping with depression, and finally, her former partner Hulk – surprisingly – has reached the final stage of grief: the stage of acceptance.

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Denial: Thor

According to the Kübler-Ross model, the first reaction to a great tragedy is denial. In this stage, the individual refuses to see the truth of their situation and clings to a false reality to cope with the shock of the event.

One of the biggest reveals in Endgame is the physical appearance of the God of Thunder, who seems to have really let himself go in five years between the Decimation and current-day Endgame. Sporting a big belly, and playing video games in his seashore shack in the Earth-based New Asgard, Thor has been drinking, eating, and overeating to forget about the fact that he failed his friends, his family, and his people. Thor has become a shadow of his former self. Rather than facing the truth and coming to terms with what happened, Thor hides from the world. When Hulk and Rocket come to visit him, Thor forbids them to use Thanos’ name, the name of the villain he has “already beaten” by lopping off his head. Still, Thor fully knows the act itself was merely a hollow gesture after having failed to use the mighty weapon that was granted to him in the right manner. His pride got in the way, and it cost half of the universe their lives. Naming himself an idiot and a failure, Thor’s shame runs deep and it takes the words of the now much wiser Hulk to start coming to terms with what happened at the end of Infinity War.

Anger: Hawkeye

Once denial is no longer feasible, individuals who’ve been through a tragedy often become frustrated, asking “why me?”, or “why did this happen?”.

A few years after having finally settled down with his family following the events of Captain America: Civil War, Clint finds his entire family turned to dust by Thanos’ finger snap. Rather than asking “why me?”, Hawkeye’s anger is focused on the question: “why them?” Why did so many innocent people have to die, when so many who make their living hurting others got to live? The death of Clint’s family leads him to hunt down those who, according to him, don’t deserve to continue living in a world where innocent individuals could not. Without the emotional support of Natasha, Clint embarks on a rogue spree, killing people left and right in the name of (false) judgment. As with Thor, it takes a fellow Avenger to bring Clint back into the fold and help him channel his anger towards avenging his family, rather than simply seeking revenge.

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

Bargaining: Captain America

During the third stage of grief, individuals try to negotiate to avoid their grief through hope, by focusing on what can be gained, rather than lost.

One of the first moments in Endgame set in the year 2023, is a scene of Steve counseling fellow Decimation survivors in a support group. Together, they try to attribute meaning to what happened to their lives and the lives of their friends and loved ones. Steve councils the meeting’s attendants, stating that they owe it to the ones that lost their lives to make something of that what’s left; in short: to be grateful for life. The person who least believes his own words, however, is Steve himself. Though Steve uses his own life as an analogy of having lost something or someone and having to move on, we’ve seen in previous films that Steve never really did move on and would take any chance to return to the life that was taken from him. Steve never got over the loss of the life he could’ve led with his one true love, Peggy Carter. Still, simply rejecting the life that was left to him would be to disrespect the lives that were lost.

Steve’s story arc at the beginning of Endgame is closely related to that of Natasha. Trying to focus on what is left rather than what is lost, he maintains his position by Natasha’s side as her trusted friend. Because of this, he is willing to help Natasha when an opportunity arises to possibly reverse Thanos’ actions. In a way, Natasha reminds him that the Avengers still have a cause worth fighting for, even after their defeat in Wakanda.

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

Depression: Natasha

Individuals going through the stage of depression are often lost in despair. They no longer feel there is a purpose to their lives and question the meaning of their own actions. Individuals in the fourth stage of grief often withdraw themselves and are stuck in a mournful emotional state.

While Steve seems to be the one who has given up the mission, it is Natasha who embodies the stage of depression in Endgame. Having lost all she lived for, including her best friend Clint, Natasha shelters herself from the world, pretending to be alright for as long as she can make herself believe she is still doing what she is supposed to be doing. Rather than falling silent, she floods herself with work, taking up leadership at the Avengers headquarters. Underneath the surface, however, Natasha seems to have already given up; therefore, her goal is to bring back the one person she perhaps can still save: Clint.

When the opportunity arises to bring back their friends and restore life in the universe, it is Natasha her drive to overcome her feeling of helplessness that eventually brings everybody back together for their biggest mission yet.

Acceptance: Hulk

In the final stage of grief, individuals embrace the inevitable, allowing the past to be, while focussing on the future. They gain retrospective insight into the tragedy which affected them and become emotionally stable.

Surprisingly – especially after the struggles the character went through in Avengers: Age of Ultron, Thor: Ragnarok, and Infinity War – Hulk is the Avenger who seems to have come to terms with what happened in Wakanda. Having merged Bruce Banner and the Hulk into one form, Bruce now seems to be in full control of his life. He learned that the Hulk was not a tool to be used, nor a monster to be suppressed. By owning up to his own failures, Bruce has made himself stronger. Acknowledging his previous mistakes – such as his outburst in South Africa – was one of the most important steps in coming to terms with himself and the monster within him. Taking full advantage of both bodies and minds, Bruce’s renewed positive nature eventually helps bring Thor back into the fold.

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

Conclusion

If Thor, Hawkeye, Natasha, Steve, and Bruce represent the five stages of grief as proposed by the Kübler-Ross model, then Tony represents what follows those stages: a new life, with a renewed sense of purpose.

Tony has fully moved on and away from his former life. In 2023, he has come to the point where his gains have become greater than his losses. This leads to his rejection of the idea to reverse the tragedy caused by Thanos; by the time his former colleagues show up on his doorstep Tony has already processed the events of Infinity War through his love for Pepper and his daughter, Morgan.

In the end, each of the Avengers puts aside their worries in favor of hope – the hope to restore what once was. Tony’s desire to maintain his current reality, however, forms a crux in the Avengers’ plan in Endgame but that’s another story!

How do you feel the Russo Brothers handled the aftermath of Avengers: Infinity War in Endgame?

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

The Representation of the Five Stages of Grief in Avengers: Endgame Read More »

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I

In the 2015 article The Future of Franchising: The Shared Universe, I discussed the development of franchising strategies within Hollywood. In the 2010s, these strategies cumulated in the dawn of interconnected franchising through “cinematic universes”, such as the Marvel Cinematic Universe and the DC Extended Universe. Today, as we watch Captain Marvel sore into the skies and impatiently wait for Avengers: Endgame to hit the big screen, I want to discuss the other franchising model which developed during the 2010s: the multi-part film.

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

About the Multi-Part Film

The days of complex, lengthy films that don’t allow themselves to be bogged down by the attention span of the “average audience member” are long gone. During the 1970s and 1980s, Hollywood standardized its cinematic output into what we know now as “blockbuster cinema”. George Lucas’ Star Wars became such a big hit that the formula for the film has been copy-pasted for over 40 years. Most movies coming out of Hollywood share the same plot points, the same character beats, and even the same length. The average movie has a runtime of 106 minutes -comedies and horror films are generally a bit shorter, action-adventure films and dramas a little longer. If a film threatens to become “too long” in the eyes of its producers, it is cut to the point where the “average audience member” remains satisfied… yet the story often becomes muddled and confusing.

It would be naïve to believe this was the reason for the creation of the multi-part film – a film typically split in two, labeled with tags such as “Part I” and “Part II”. Unfortunately, money is the name of the game. Though technically Quentin Tarantino’s Kill Bill was the first film to be split in half, it was the Harry Potter franchise that first used the concept as a franchising strategy. In March 2008, Warner Bros. announced they would split the last installment of the massively popular wizarding franchise in half. With the source material running out, this decision was their best option to squeeze the most cash out of their money-making franchise – until they decided to follow it up with another five-part film series, of course.

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I
(Credit: Kill Bill)

The reason given for splitting Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows into two parts was that the source material by J. K. Rowling was considered too rich to fit into just one film (of producer-approved length). The split caused a bit of controversy, but both films were eventually well-received, as previous installments in the film series had been criticized for cutting down too heavily on the story told in the novels.

Still, Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows: Part I and Part II instantly showed a flaw in the new franchising model which would become even more apparent in later multi-part films: the first part struggled with pacing issues, while the second part was too heavy on the action and lacked character development. Part I introduced the stakes, and Part II gave us the climax, but neither was able to give us both: the films can’t be – and probably will never be – watched as separate films.

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I
(Credit: Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows)

Following Harry

The critical and financial success of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows ignited a short, but powerful new trend in Hollywood. Apparently, studios could double their intake by splitting films in half! The Twilight Saga was the first to take the bait. Despite their negative reception, the Twilight films had quite a strong following, which allowed its producers to cut their film reel in half and double their intake on Breaking Dawn. The result was even worse than expected: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn: Part I told the story of how Bella and Edward prepared for their wedding, said the words, and then consummated their marriage. Though its runtime was nearly two hours, the whole film could have been summarized as the 15-minute setup for Part II. As with The Deathly Hallows, the first part of Breaking Dawn lacked action, while the second part had a surplus of it. In both cases, however, the second part received praise for delivering on the franchise’s overall storyline.

It’s easy to compare the development of the multi-part film franchising strategy to the trend of creating cinematic universes. Marvel Studios set up the first five films of the MCU as the lead-up to its climax, The Avengers. Just like with the split of Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows, this idea came from the desire to tell a great story. The franchises that followed The Avengers wished to duplicate its success by trying to quickly milk their own cash cow franchises, but by doing so before even raising their calf to cow. The Amazing Spider-Man 2, Batman v Superman: Dawn of Justice, The Mummy (as well as Dracula Untold), and King Arthur: Legend of the Sword all became franchise killers rather than grand successes. The same happened with the multi-part film.

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I
(Credit: The Twilight Saga: Breaking Dawn)

The red flags raised by Breaking Dawn didn’t prevent other franchises from trying to cash in on the latest trend. In an attempt to prolong their respective series’ existence, The Hobbit famously split its paper-thin storyline into an overly long three-part film series; The Hunger Games massacred its audience’s goodwill by slaughtering the franchise’s pacing with The Hunger Games: Mockingjay: Part I; and perhaps the most painful of all: The Divergent series decision to split its final film into two films turned out so bad that the studio never even bothered to finish the franchise.

The Superhero Contribution

Meanwhile, two major franchises still had a “Part I” and “Part II” in the pipeline. In October 2014, both Warner Bros. and Marvel Studios announced to split their team up-films: they would present us with Justice League Part One and Part Two and Avengers: Infinity War: Part I and Part II. After the critical reception of Mockingjay and Allegiant, however, the tags for both franchises were dropped and each film was marketed as a separate story. Unfortunately, Justice League didn’t fare well critically or commercially and any plans for a sequel – whether as a “part two” or as a separate storyline – were put on hold.

In turn, Avengers: Infinity War was neatly folded into the MCU as a singular entry. Though there are some people who wish to argue Avengers: Infinity War had an open ending, this is far from true when looking at the story the movie tells. In the year leading up to the release of Infinity War, the Russo brothers often pointed out that the film would tell the story of Thanos, marking him as the film’s main character. In the film, Thanos’ storyline follows the same traditional three-act structure as, for example, Tony Stark’s storyline in Iron Man. In Infinity War, Thanos hoped to collect all six infinity stones to be able to balance the universe. Along the way, he was thwarted by a series of enemies and, after being almost defeated and losing something precious to him, he finally managed to defeat the bad guys and achieve his goal. Though the film carried the bankable Avengers name, the superhero team’s role in the film was that of the antagonists.

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I
(Credit: Marvel Studios)

The Future of the Multi-Part Film

The commercial and/or critical failure of most of the multi-part films released after Harry Potter and the Deathly Hallows seems to have lessened the willingness of the major studios to take the risk of splitting their films, regardless of the strategy’s short-term financial benefits. The decisions made by Marvel Studios and Warner Bros. to shy away from the model after having already announced the release of their split films, gave a clear indication that Hollywood’s major studios began to see the long-term consequences of splitting their stories in half.

Marvel Studios’ clever way of handling the story of Infinity War and the decision not to cut back on the three-hour runtime of Avengers: Endgame now seems to have truly put a nail in the coffin of the short-lived franchising strategy. If it’s up to the Russo brothers – and while handling a franchise as successful as the MCU, it kind of is – the future of film seems to be a return to the days of old, when movies like Gone with the Wind and Ben-Hur still ran for as long as it took to tell a great story.

How do you feel about the multi-part film strategy?

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

The History of the Multi-Part Film, Part I of I Read More »

A World Without Cinema

A World Without Cinema: A Short History of Saudi Arabia’s 35 Year Cinema-Ban

What was the first movie you ever watched in theatres? Was it a family-friendly animated film, or the action-packed blockbuster your father really wanted to see? For me, it was most probably Walt Disney’s Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs in 1991. At the cuddleable age of four, me and my two older sisters were granted something that has become increasingly rare in the modern world: the cinematic re-release of classic films. Over the course of a few years, our local cinema showed many of the films from Walt Disney’s Classics library, ushering us into the world of cinema.

A World Without Cinema
(Credit: Nuovo Cinema Paradiso)

What we experienced as children, others could only dream of. In 1980s, in the heart of the Middle East, the government of Saudi Arabia decided to put an end to cinema. At the time, the country had some improvised movie halls, which screened Egyptian, Turkish and Indian films, but they did so without government authorization. According to the Saudi government, cinema was deemed un-Islamic on grounds of the country’s legal system, which is firmly based on the Islamic Shari’a law derived from the Qur’an. Among other things, Shari’a law prohibits gender mixing, listening to music, and the public exposure of women, making it difficult for film to find a place within Saudi society. All but one of the country’s film theatres were shut down; the IMAX theatre in Khobar that did remain open only showed only educational films.

In the early 2000s, over two decades after the nationwide closure of cinemas, Saudi’s Minister of Culture and Information Iyyad Madani submitted a request to once again open a movie theatre in the country. Though his request was met with strong opposition due to the influence of Saudi’s religious authority, polls concerning the request indicated that 90% of Saudi’s population agreed to the opening of new movie theatres. The request was eventually denied, but it wasn’t the definitive end of cinema in Saudi Arabia: in 2006, the first Jeddah Film Festival was hosted in the country, showing both local and foreign films. The festival received no government authorization and ran for only three years, until it was banned in 2009.

A World Without Cinema
(Credit: How are You?)

Meanwhile, the country had begun to produce its own films. Under the wings of the Rotana Group, a large Arabic entertainment company owned by Saudi Prince Walid bin Tallal, film director Izidore Musallam managed to shoot the first big-budget Saudi film, titled How are You? in 2006. Starring the country’s first actress Hind Mohammed, but filmed in the United Arab Emirates, the film was only a small step towards a more liberal stance on cinema. Despite being the country’s first big film production, How are You? was only shown to Saudi audiences through pay-per-view television. To see films in an actual movie theatre, Saudis still had to travel abroad.

It took another three years before a film was shown with government authorization. After a campaign advocating the screening of the Saudi-produced comedy Menahi, the film was shown in conference rooms in Riyadh to select audiences consisting of men and children up to twelve years old to avoid gender-mixing. The fall-out of the screening, however, caused an even stricter ban on cinema, leading to the aforementioned ban on the Jeddah Film Festival.

A World Without Cinema
(Credit: Wadjda)

One of Saudi Arabia’s film industry’s most recent successes was the light-hearted comedy-drama Wadjda, detailing the efforts of a young Muslim girl to gather enough money to purchase a bicycle. It took director Haifaa Al-Mansour five years to make the film: since the country had no film industry to speak of it was difficult to find financial backing. Al-Mansour disclosed to the Financial Times that she eventually received backing from the Rotana Group, but this still left her with the difficult problem of getting permission to shoot the film in Saudi Arabia itself. In spite of the hardships she faced, Al-Mansour succeeded in her goals. Wadjda became the first Saudi film to be shot in its entirety in the country itself. Due to the strict Shari’a law in the country, however, Al-Mansour often had to work from the back of a van while filming Wadjda, as social rules dictated she was not allowed to be seen in public with the male members of her crew. Al-Mansour’s film went on to become Saudi Arabia’s first official submission for the Academy Awards.

Five years after Wadjda‘s international success, negotiations finally began to once again allow cinemas to open in the country. Over the years, several advantages concerning the re-opening of cinemas had been pointed out by those who enforced the idea, such as the artistic value of the film, the creation of new jobs, and the economic benefits of a flourishing film industry. This eventually won the government over to re-establish a national film industry. In doing so, they would also reduce Saudi Arabia’s economic reliance on oil.

After several months of negotiation, on 11 December 2017, the country’s current Minister of Culture and Information, Dr. Awwad S. Alawwad, announced that Saudi Arabia would allow the opening of cinemas for the first time after 35 years as part of its Saudi Vision 2030 initiative to stimulate Saudi Arabia’s economy. New movie theatres would be built to showcase typical Hollywood blockbusters deemed “culturally sensitive” by the government. The Jeddah Film Festival was renewed – this time with government authorization – and showed The Emoji Movie and Captain Underpants in January 2018. Still a deeply conservative country at heart, the films were chosen for their inoffensiveness. Future movies that were to be shown in the country would be subjected to censorship in accordance with Saudi Arabia’s cultural values.

After the festival, Black Panther became the first movie to be officially shown in Saudi Arabia’s new, single-screen movie theatre. After a five-day run starting April 18th, the screening of Black Panther was quickly followed up by the country’s second major release: on April 26th, Avengers: Infinity War started screening, becoming Saudi Arabia’s second “box-office success” in 35 years time.

A World Without Cinema
(Credit: Black Panther)

What movies such as Snow White and the Seven Dwarfs were to us as we opened our eyes to the magical world of cinema during our childhood, the already world-dominating Marvel Cinematic Universe is now doing for Saudi Arabia’s new-born movie-going audiences. Just imagine those born in the 1980s; for them, at the ages of 28 to 38, Black Panther and Avengers: Infinity War will actually be the first films they get to see on a big screen… An extremely foreign idea for us, growing up watching and re-watching all of our favorite films on the silver screen.

I’m very curious about where Saudi Arabia will go next. What films will be shown in Saudi theatres in the next few years? And will their national film industry start producing more cinematic gems such as Al-Mansour’s Wadjda? Personally, I can’t wait to see what the country’s filmmakers have to say now that their government has taken a more liberal stance of cinema…

Either way, I welcome Saudi Arabia to the wonderful world of film!

What was the first film you saw in cinemas, and how old were you at the time? Can you imagine living in a world without cinema?

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

A World Without Cinema: A Short History of Saudi Arabia’s 35 Year Cinema-Ban Read More »

Questioning the Snap

Questioning the Snap: How Thanos caused an extinction-level event and ruined yogurt

Intelligent, calculated, and truly righteous in his own beliefs, Thanos snapped his fingers at the end of Avengers: Infinity War, disintegrating half of all life across the universe. Josh Brolin’s Mad Titan shocked audiences around the world as fan-favorite characters such as T’Challa, Groot and Spider-Man turned to dust. During the movie’s post-credits scene we saw the effects of the snap taking out half of the population of New York City, which included the disappearance of agents Maria Hill and Nick Fury.

Questioning the Snap
(Credit: Avengers: Endgame)

On the surface it seemed Thanos delivered exactly what he had promised: he decreased the universe’s population by 50%, bringing balance to the cosmos. The absence of detail in this life-changing plan, however, complicates things quite a bit. Because, if Thanos aimed to actually decrease 50% of all life, he miserably failed. This becomes evident in the film’s final scenes: Wakanda’s lush environment not only served as the Avengers’ final battleground, but also betrayed a flaw in Thanos’ master plan. The moment the Mad Titan snapped his fingers, we saw half of the people present on the battlefield disintegrate… but every tree, grass leave and shrub surrounding our heroes peacefully sat out the destructive event…

This raises several questions. Did Thanos actually aim to erase 50% of all life? And if he did, then why didn’t half of all those trees vanish as well? In fact… how exactly does the Infinity Gauntlet work?

Questioning the Snap
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

By definition, life is a characteristic attributed to physical entities to distinguish them from inorganic matter. It is a condition that indicates a capacity for growth, functional activity, reproduction, and continual change preceding death. According to the taxonomic system set by Carl Woese in 1990, the tree of life consists of three domains: Archaea, Bacteria, and Eukarya. The domain of the Eukarya then consists of the five taxonomic kingdoms; Animalia (animals), Plantae (plants), Fungi (fungi), Protista (unicellular organisms), and Monera (unicellular organisms without a nucleus). Given this definition, half of all vegetation in Wakanda should have disappeared along with our favorite heroes. Since obviously, it didn’t, we’ll have to take a closer look at how exactly the Infinity Gauntlet itself operates.

In the movie, Thanos utilizes the Infinity Gauntlet without the use of spoken words or spells. As such, the gauntlet seems to follow its operator’s thoughts and wishes, rather than their direct vocal commands. This is most obvious when Thanos utilizes the Space Stone to transport himself across the cosmos: without directly informing the gauntlet where he wants to go, the device transports him to his destination. Through these scenes, it becomes evident that the Infinity Stones not only delve into their master’s consciousness, but also his subconscious. Halfway the movie, the Space Stone transports Thanos and Gamora to Vormir. Not knowing the exact location of the Soul Stone, nor whether the Stone is actually there, the Space Stone transports Thanos to a safe location near the supposed hiding place of the Stone. At the close of the movie, however, the Space Stone perfectly reads Thanos intentions to transport himself to the Mind Stone, of which he knows the exact state and location.

This indicates that the Infinity Stones not just execute what their master consciously desires, but utilize a deeper reading of the gauntlet’s operators’ true intentions. Thus, even though Thanos claimed to want to erase half of all life in the universe, this did not happen because the Infinity Stones read his true, subconscious purpose as being slightly different.

Questioning the Snap
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Still, the full extent of Thanos’ destructive desire is left unexplored. Visibly, we saw several human and alien species being affected by the spell. As categorized in the taxonomic kingdom of the Animalia, the non-disappearance of Wakanda’s foliage doesn’t rule out the fact that all animal life on Earth – and elsewhere – has been decreased by 50% as well. If so, this would mean Thanos achieved the far opposite of bringing balance to the universe: a plethora of species that were on the brink of extinction even before the Titan’s infamous snap now no longer stand a chance of survival, while species with an abundant universal population – such as humans, or, say, the Kree – can now simply continue their exponential growth insight of the abundant resources that have become available to them after the erasure of half of their species.

In 2016, one of the four remaining Yangtze giant soft-shell turtles alive on Earth died of natural causes in Vietnam’s Hoan Kiem Lake. There are now only three Yangtze turtles left: two males – one possibly infertile – and one female. If we accept Thanos’ intentions as decreasing every species by 50%, rather than erasing a random 50% of all life in the universe, this would mean that in the best-case scenario only one of the turtles turned to dust. Worst-case scenario, Thanos ended the species altogether. The same goes for many other species: from the Sumatran tiger to the Mahé boulder cricket, many of Earth’s lifeforms would no longer stand a chance of survival in the presence of human dominance – if ever they did. This would then qualify as an extinction-level event, which is defined as a widespread and rapid decrease in the biodiversity on Earth. If anything, Thanos would have paved the way for humans to completely overtake the Earth and deplete its natural resources rather than “save” our planet. His actions may have halted overpopulation for a generation or two, but in the long run, his snap would have actually ended the existence of those species that were already struggling and doomed the species that were already numerous through self-destruction by overpopulation – the very thing he tried to prevent.

Questioning the Snap
(Credit: Pixabay)

Taken one step further, Thanos’ life-ending crime might have even more complex consequences: if the snap erased half of all individuals within the Protista and Monera kingdoms as well, it is very likely all life in the universe will cease to exist. Humans, for example, are colonized by trillion of bacteria – estimates range from 15 to 150 trillion individual bacteria per body. Due to our co-dependency on bacterial life, it would be catastrophic for our bodies if half of our residential bacteria would be turned to dust.

Outside our bodies, the consequences of Thanos’ snap would be equally saddening: just think about every product that is produced through bacteria: all the yogurt in the entire universe would instantly expire! Made through the bacterial fermentation of milk, Thanos snapping half of all life away would instantly decimate half of all “yogurt cultures” in our universe, perishing everything from Turkey’s delicious Ayran to Dovga, the unique yogurt-based soup of Azerbaijan and the Outer Rim’s Blue milk. Thanos halving the population of lactobacillus bulgaricus and streptococcus thermophiles would thus seriously affect our breakfasts…

Questioning the Snap
(Credit: Pixabay)

Luckily, it seemed the remaining Avengers did not suffer from any internal problems by the end of Avengers: Infinity War, indicating their bacterial colonies – as well as the strained Greek yogurts and foreign cheeses in their fridges – were still intact. This leads us to the conclusion that perhaps the Infinity Gauntlet read Thanos’ desire as “ending all sentient life in the universe”… Which poses a whole new philosophical question and opens the debate on whether animals – and alien species, such as the mindless Outriders or Morag’s Orloni – are considered sentient or not… and whether Thanos’ subconscious – as read by the Infinity Stones – believes them to be.

How deep do you think Thanos’ desire to half the universe’s population ran? Do you think post-Infinity War Earth still hosts Yangtze turtles? And is the idea that perhaps your yogurt didn’t expire give you some peace of mind?

Read the full You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

Questioning the Snap: How Thanos caused an extinction-level event and ruined yogurt Read More »

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine

‘Avengers: Infinity War’ and the Marvel Marketing Machine

Black Panther passed the $1 billion mark at the box office, Avengers: Infinity War is expected to have a $215 million opening debut in North America and Kevin Feige is starting to tease audiences around the world with what lies beyond the 2019 Untitled Avengers Movie. Marvel Studios’ sowed the seeds for their Cinematic Universe before any other studio followed and they are now raking in their cash. Together, we have granted them $14,5 billion of our hard-earned pocket money in just under a decade and we are already marking new release dates in our calendars to give them a bit more.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Marvel Studios’ movies have been accused of lacking in diversity, being too repetitive, and hosting underdeveloped villains, but generally speaking, the Marvel Cinematic Universe has been a critical and financial success. Though much of this comes from the hard labor of the film studio’s cast and crew, a major unseen player in the success of the MCU – and our resulting addiction to it – was orchestrated by the studio’s marketing department. Throughout the decade, a series of marketing strategies have made the MCU the juggernaut franchise it is today.

1: Traditional Marketing

The most obvious form of marketing Marvel Studios has entailed is the use of traditional marketing. The release of production photos and behind-the-scenes shots, teasers and trailers, teaser, character and “final” posters, TV show and festival appearances, and a host of corporate advertisements. Nowadays, each new piece of marketing material that the studio releases is reported on by a host of different websites, creating more and more traction for their upcoming film(s).

Now that Marvel is gearing up for the release of Infinity War, their marketing team’s strategies become all the more clear, showing that the use of cross-franchise marketing lies at the heart of the MCU’s success.

In July 2017, Marvel Studios released footage of Infinity War at San Diego Comic-Con International. With the release of Guardians of the Galaxy Vol. 2 and Thor: Ragnarok insight, the footage focused heavily on Thor and the Guardians of the Galaxy, making those two movies must-see events for those awaiting the release of Infinity War. Several months later – and only a few months before the release of Black Panther – the first international trailer for Infinity War heavily featured Black Panther and the nation of Wakanda, boosting the hype for both films within a single trailer. The trailer was viewed 230 million times in its first 24 hours online, serving its purpose majestically.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

Soon, the new trailer for Infinity War will arrive. Questions are asked every day as to when this will happen, but looking back at Marvel’s previous marketing strategies, it’s not too hard to guess when it will land. The first Infinity War trailer was released after Thor: Ragnarok to not distract attention from Thor’s solo outing, and the marketing department carefully waited two weeks for the fallout of the release of Justice League to blow over to make sure their trailer wouldn’t be snowed under by articles and reviews concerning Warner Bros. ensemble film. Now, several weeks after Black Panther and with no other superhero release standing in its way, the marketing department is surely ready to release Infinity War‘s second trailer.

Over the course of the next few weeks, we will also see a rise in corporate advertisements for Infinity War. Marvel previously paired up a host of companies for cross-branding campaigns, such as their team-ups with Audi and the NBA for the marketing campaign of Spider-Man: Homecoming. For Homecoming, Marvel brilliantly produced the Audi-sponsored short film Driver’s Test and the NBA-inspired short Watch the Game

The corporate short films produced for Homecoming bring us to the marketing strategy Marvel Studios truly excels at… storytelling.

Spider-Man: Driver’s Test (Sony / Marvel Studios))

2: Storytelling

A movie can be a form of advertisement in itself. Some film series, such as the Cars and Star Wars franchises, earn their existence in great part to the sale of merchandise. The concept of the Marvel Cinematic Universe, however, allows its owners to market films with films.

It all started with the post-credit scene in Iron Man, where Nick Fury approached Tony Stark to “talk about the Avenger Initiative.” This led to an improvised cameo of Stark in The Incredible Hulk, a movie that additionally featured a host of small Easter egg references to Stark, Nick Fury, the Super-Soldier serum, and other (past and future) MCU elements. Iron Man 2 expanded the framework and even included a small reference to Wakanda; the character of Phil Coulson offered further connective tissue; and the Tesseract’s role as Phase One’s MacGuffin was felt throughout Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, and The Avengers. Stingers attached to the end of the Phase One films teased audiences about what’s to come, and the step-by-step introductions of new characters, objects, and places eventually led to 2012’s megahit The Avengers. The Avengers brought fans of Iron Man together with fans of Thor and turned those who previously didn’t care much for the Hulk or Captain America into loyal followers.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: The Avengers)

Every release after The Avengers then got bumped by the critical and financial success of the studio’s ensemble epic. In Phase Two Easter eggs were supplemented by a host of cameos. Where in Phase One Steve Rogers’ shield popped up in a scene, in Phase Two Marvel Studios could actually afford to have Rogers himself pop up for a cameo. Iron Man 3 tagged on the Hulk, while Thor: The Dark World saw the introduction of the Collector. Captain America: The Winter Soldier paired Captain America with Iron Man 2‘s Black Widow and Nick Fury and introduced von Strucker, List, Quicksilver and Scarlet Witch, and Avengers: Age of Ultron brought everyone together again.

Age of Ultron and Captain America: Civil War amplified the effect of marketing-through-storytelling by upping the synergy between the movies. Phase Three has been characterized by the pairing of characters to amplify box office results: Captain America and Iron Man shared the screen in Civil War, Spider-Man and Iron Man teamed up in Spider-Man: Homecoming, and Thor and the Hulk went on a space adventure in Thor: Ragnarok, thus turning the concept of the “solo movie” upside down.

The connective tissue and framing of the Marvel Cinematic Universe serve more than just the delivery of great, long-term stories: it is a powerful marketing tool that makes it rewarding for audiences not to skip any of the studio’s releases. This is what brings us to the third overall marketing strategy: the carefully planned introduction of new (secondary) characters.

3: Character Introductions and Spin-offs

After Iron Man 2 rolled out, no less than four new spin-off movies were put in production: Black Widow, Nick Fury, Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D., and War Machine. The first still hasn’t found its footing yet, despite writers having handed in their first drafts even before The Avengers hit the big screen; the second is now being rebranded into a Captain Marvel movie; the third went on to become a television series; and the fourth never got passed the initial writing stage. Thor, Captain America: The First Avenger, and The Avengers led to similar announcements. Though hardly memorable, both The Warrior’s Three, The Winter Soldier and Hawkeye spin-off movies were considered. We all know what happened to the former characters; Bucky Barnes reincarnation was obviously better suited to present himself in a Captain America movie; and Hawkeye might just wind up sharing a movie with Black Widow. In the years since Phase One, however, spin-off announcements have been kept mostly under wraps. After The Avengers, it was obvious that making spin-offs based on all those formerly mentioned characters was unrealistic at best, even when producing three films a year. Though Kevin Feige discussed the spin-off possibilities of Black Panther this week, mentioning the potential of an Okoye spin-off series, these kind of remarks – whether scripts are actually ordered or not – are often no more than promotional speeches for the movies the “spin-off characters” appear in.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Thor)

It wasn’t until 2016, eight years after the start of the MCU, that a new character was introduced in an ensemble film, with fixed plans for a spin-off film: Warner Bros.’s Wonder Woman. Of course, Marvel Studios soon followed with Captain America: Civil War, which laid the groundwork for Spider-Man: Homecoming and Black Panther. Though presented as “not another origin story”, Spider-Man: Homecoming was an origin story in absolutely every single way, except the fact that the first fifteen minutes where Peter Parker is introduced and he gets bitten by a spider are missing. In the film, Peter tests his powers, struggles with them, learns, and fails, but then becomes the hero he is meant to be after all. Civil War just took care over the introduction part, warmer audiences for yet another Spider-Man reboot.

As I discussed back in 2015’s Sexism and Racism in Hollywood: The Black Force Awakens, the early introduction of these characters was intended to carefully lower the risks of the new heroes’ solo outings. By familiarizing audiences with these characters before giving them their own films, the financial stakes became more secure. Whether the success of Wonder Woman – and the future success of Captain Marvel – will actually lead to the production of a Black Widow movie remains to be seen, but if it does, expect her to be the headliner in a movie shared with at least one other character, much like Thor’s team-up with the Hulk in Thor: Ragnarok.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Thor: Ragnarok)

A second form of Marvel’s spin-off strategy is the creation of Marvel’s television department, and their output: from Agents of S.H.I.E.L.D. to this year’s Cloak & Dagger, each series co-promotes the MCU brand. Add the Marvel One-Shots, the digital series WHIH Newsfront, and the Team Thor sketches, and you begin to see the vastness of the Marvel Marketing Machine.

4: Sameness vs Diversity

People eat what they like, and film studios know it. Marvel has often been criticized for a lack of diversity in its characters and stories, but this has not stopped audiences from showing up at the box office. Strip away the details of every Marvel Studios release and you’ll see that the backbone of each solo film is exactly the same: the main hero comes to terms with his or her newfound powers and is forced into conflict with an adversary with similar powers to his or her own. The personalities of Tony Stark and Stephen Strange are pretty hard to distinguish and Scott Lang often seems like a poor man’s version of Marvel’s billionaire inventor. This sense of sameness within the main narratives, however, allowed Marvel to greatly expand its cinematic universe. By offering audiences the same story wrapped up in a vastly different package every time, they were able to grow their universe and expand their output significantly, adapting more and more obscure comic book heroes to film.

Phase One staged a world where heroes were grounded in reality. Only slowly, over the course of ten years and eighteen movies, did Marvel push their audience towards the more obscure corners of the Marvel universe. Thor brought the concept of aliens into the mix and The Avengers and Guardians of the Galaxy expanded on this. Ant-Man introduced the quantum realm and Doctor Strange took things a step further. Through slow, but steady world-building, Marvel allowed their target audience – who had just come off of Christopher Nolan’s grim, reality-based Dark Knight trilogy – to ease back into the realm of miracles and magic, while at the same time catering to general audiences as well.

After balancing sameness and diversity for over ten years, Marvel can now do whatever they want. Back when Thor was released, many articles were written on whether such a fantastical character could find its place within the previously established, reality-based MCU. Nowadays, such a thought seems almost laughable. Yet, had Marvel released Doctor Strange or Captain Marvel right after Iron Man, the MCU might have looked like the DCEU at this point: disjoint, confusing, and tonally completely off-beat. Instead, the money is pouring in and fans can’t wait to empty their wallets to see the purple scourge Thanos throw planets at our favorite Avengers.

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

5: Merchandise

Marvel also utilizes their own merchandise to advertise its movies. Rather than offering glimpses of characters and events in a new trailer or poster, (previews of) tie-in comic books, LEGO sets, collectible figures, video games, and others are released online to tease audiences of what’s to come, while at the same time marketing the toys and games themselves.

Infinity War again offers a few prime examples of this: the Infinity War LEGO sets, for example, reveal several scenes and team-ups from the movie and several previewed action figures offered fans their first look at the new costumes some heroes will be donning in the movie, such as Peter Parker’s Iron Spider costume and Tony Stark’s bleeding edge armor.

Marvel’s Avengers: Reunion

Together, all Marvel Studios’ marketing efforts mentioned – and the dozens that are still unmentioned – have created a powerful, well-rounded marketing machine able to overwhelm its audience over and over again, until the end of time. Because watching The Avengers come together on the big screen, or seeing Thor and the Hulk bumbling through space, has become like a reunion of old friends. These friends – our friends – were carefully placed in our midst, in our theatres, in our homes, and in our collective minds. And really, aside from those critics who scream and yell “superhero fatigue” is on its way, without ever watching superhero movies themselves, who would let their friends hanging at the box office?

Avengers Infinity War and the Marvel Marketing Machine
(Credit: Avengers: Infinity War)

You can also read this article on Flickering Myth.

More articles on Movies

‘Avengers: Infinity War’ and the Marvel Marketing Machine Read More »